Stopping Autonomous Vehicles

with Gestures – A VR Experiment

Stopping Autonomous Vehicles

with Gestures – A VR Experiment

How intuitive gestures build trust among pedestrians toward automated vehicles

How intuitive gestures build trust among pedestrians toward automated vehicles

This study examines whether hand gestures help pedestrians safely prompt autonomous vehicles to stop. In a VR experiment, we analysed crossing behaviour in different scenarios, with and without additional communication options. The results show that gestures significantly increase trust, safety, and willingness to act, but they also introduce new challenges for interaction design.

This study examines whether hand gestures help pedestrians safely prompt autonomous vehicles to stop. In a VR experiment, we analysed crossing behaviour in different scenarios, with and without additional communication options. The results show that gestures significantly increase trust, safety, and willingness to act, but they also introduce new challenges for interaction design.

Problem:

The lack of clear interaction and communication concepts between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians led to uncertainty and made decision-making in road traffic more difficult.

Approach:

Conceptualization and prototypical development of interaction solutions that use visual cues and clear communication mechanisms to make the behavior of autonomous vehicles understandable.

Impact:

Increased trust and a better basis for decision-making for users through clearly understandable interactions between people and systems in critical traffic situations.

Problem:

The lack of clear interaction and communication concepts between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians led to uncertainty and made decision-making in road traffic more difficult.

Approach:

Conceptualization and prototypical development of interaction solutions that use visual cues and clear communication mechanisms to make the behavior of autonomous vehicles understandable.

Impact:

Increased trust and a better basis for decision-making for users through clearly understandable interactions between people and systems in critical traffic situations.

Problem:

The lack of clear interaction and communication concepts between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians led to uncertainty and made decision-making in road traffic more difficult.

Approach:

Conceptualization and prototypical development of interaction solutions that use visual cues and clear communication mechanisms to make the behavior of autonomous vehicles understandable.

Impact:

Increased trust and a better basis for decision-making for users through clearly understandable interactions between people and systems in critical traffic situations.

Problem:

The lack of clear interaction and communication concepts between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians led to uncertainty and made decision-making in road traffic more difficult.

Approach:

Conceptualization and prototypical development of interaction solutions that use visual cues and clear communication mechanisms to make the behavior of autonomous vehicles understandable.

Impact:

Increased trust and a better basis for decision-making for users through clearly understandable interactions between people and systems in critical traffic situations.

Problem:

The lack of clear interaction and communication concepts between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians led to uncertainty and made decision-making in road traffic more difficult.

Approach:

Conceptualization and prototypical development of interaction solutions that use visual cues and clear communication mechanisms to make the behavior of autonomous vehicles understandable.

Impact:

Increased trust and a better basis for decision-making for users through clearly understandable interactions between people and systems in critical traffic situations.

Problem:

The lack of clear interaction and communication concepts between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians led to uncertainty and made decision-making in road traffic more difficult.

Approach:

Conceptualization and prototypical development of interaction solutions that use visual cues and clear communication mechanisms to make the behavior of autonomous vehicles understandable.

Impact:

Increased trust and a better basis for decision-making for users through clearly understandable interactions between people and systems in critical traffic situations.

View study

Would you like to learn more about my study?


Here you can find my paper with all the key content.

Would you like to learn more about my study?


Here you can find my paper with all the key content.

View study

View study

View study

View study

Focus:

Focus:

UX Research, Trust & Interaction

UX Research, Trust & Interaction

Format:

Format:

Scientific Study / VR Experiment

Scientific Study / VR Experiment

Key questions:

Key questions:

Which gesture(s) can be used to stop automated vehicles?

Which gesture(s) can be used to stop automated vehicles?

Can a gesture like this strengthen pedestrians’ trust in automated vehicles?

Can a gesture like this strengthen pedestrians’ trust in automated vehicles?

My role

My role

Research

Research

Design of the test environment and questionnaires

Design of the test environment and questionnaires

Analyze

Analyze

Evaluation

Evaluation

Skills

Skills

Human–Vehicle Interaction Research

Human–Vehicle Interaction Research

Gesture-Based Interaction Design

Gesture-Based Interaction Design

Experimental UX Research

Experimental UX Research

Wizard-of-Oz Prototyping

Wizard-of-Oz Prototyping

Mixed-Methods Analysis

Mixed-Methods Analysis

Trust and Safety UX

Trust and Safety UX

Behavioral Pattern Analysis

Behavioral Pattern Analysis

Problem Statement

Problem statement

Problem Statement

In road traffic, pedestrians rely on implicit human signals such as eye contact or vehicle behavior. Autonomous vehicles disrupt this familiar communication — there is a lack of a clear, intuitive interface between humans and machines.

In road traffic, pedestrians rely on implicit human signals such as eye contact or vehicle behavior. Autonomous vehicles disrupt this familiar communication — there is a lack of a clear, intuitive interface between humans and machines.

Hypothesis

Hypothesis

Explicit hand gestures enable intuitive, always-available communication with autonomous vehicles—and thereby increase trust, safety, and willingness to cross.

Explicit hand gestures enable intuitive, always-available communication with autonomous vehicles—and thereby increase trust, safety, and willingness to cross.

01

01

Methodology

Methodology

Mixed-Methods Approach (Quantitative & Qualitative)

Mixed-Methods Approach (Quantitative & Qualitative)

Interviews conducted with participants (before and after the VR test) about trust and gesture selection

Interviews conducted with participants (before and after the VR test) about trust and gesture selection

VR Experiment (Wizard of Oz)

VR Experiment (Wizard of Oz)

Virtual test environment for participants

Virtual test environment for participants

Programming for manually stopping the vehicle at the touch of a button

Programming for manually stopping the vehicle at the touch of a button

21 participants

21 participants

Scenarios (Gesture Usage)

Scenarios (Gesture Usage)

Do not use a gesture (cross at your own risk)

Do not use a gesture (cross at your own risk)

Using a predefined gesture (palm raised and facing the vehicle)

Using a predefined gesture (palm raised and facing the vehicle)

Using a custom, freely chosen gesture

Using a custom, freely chosen gesture

Overview of the virtual test environment for participants (the red vehicle should be stopped).

Using a participant’s freely chosen gesture

Using a participant's predefined gesture

02

02

Key Findings

Key Findings

Gestures increase the willingness to cross from

~50 % to over 90 %

Gestures increase the willingness to cross from

~50 % to over 90 %

Self-selected gestures were the most effective

Self-selected gestures were the most effective

The open-palm gesture (“stop gesture”) was intuitively preferred

The open-palm gesture (“stop gesture”) was intuitively preferred

Younger participants showed higher trust than older participants.

Younger participants showed higher trust than older participants.

Most often, the hand facing the vehicle was used, regardless of whether the person was right- or left-handed.

Most often, the hand facing the vehicle was used, regardless of whether the person was right- or left-handed.

The chi-square test (χ²) examines whether there is a statistically significant relationship between two categorical variables — in this case, between the type of gesture and the vehicle’s response (stopping vs. not stopping). A high χ² value with a very small p-value (p < .001) indicates that the observed differences are not random, but that the gestures significantly influence the stopping behaviour of automated vehicles.

03

03

UX Insights

UX Insights

People seek explicit control in uncertain situations

People seek explicit control in uncertain situations

Trust is built through:

Trust is built through:

Visibility, Clarity & Predictability

Visibility, Clarity & Predictability

The human body itself becomes the interface

The human body itself becomes the interface

No additional hardware required → low barrier to entry

No additional hardware required → low barrier to entry

Challenges

Challenges

Potential misuse of gestures

Potential misuse of gestures

Traffic Flow Disruption

Traffic Flow Disruption

The Need for Clear System Rules and Feedback Mechanisms

The Need for Clear System Rules and Feedback Mechanisms

Differentiating Between Autonomous and Manual Vehicles

Differentiating Between Autonomous and Manual Vehicles

Gesture-based interaction is a promising approach to bridge the gap between people and autonomous vehicles.
It builds trust through simplicity — but requires clear rules, feedback, and systems thinking.

Gesture-based interaction is a promising approach to bridge the gap between people and autonomous vehicles.
It builds trust through simplicity — but requires clear rules, feedback, and systems thinking.

Research, where the future becomes reality.

Research, where the future becomes reality.

I investigate how people interact with new technologies — from VR to autonomous systems.

If you are looking for UX research that makes safety, trust, and behavior measurable

I investigate how people interact with new technologies — from VR to autonomous systems.

If you are looking for UX research that makes safety, trust, and behavior measurable

Interested? I’m always open to connecting, answering questions, or having a personal conversation.

Interested? I’m always open to connecting, answering questions, or having a personal conversation.

josefbley@web.de

josefbley@web.de

017661444919

017661444919

Josef Thomas Bley

Digital Product Designer

Engagement Architect

Kahlhofweg 2, 86701 Rohrenfels

josefbley@web.de

017661444919

0843147448

Josef Thomas Bley

Digital Product Designer

Engagement Architect

Kahlhofweg 2, 86701 Rohrenfels

josefbley@web.de

017661444919

0843147448

Josef Thomas Bley

Digital Product Designer

Engagement Architect

Kahlhofweg 2, 86701 Rohrenfels

josefbley@web.de

017661444919

0843147448

Josef Thomas Bley

Digital Product Designer

Engagement Architect

Kahlhofweg 2, 86701 Rohrenfels

josefbley@web.de

017661444919

0843147448

Josef Thomas Bley

Digital Product Designer

Engagement Architect

Kahlhofweg 2, 86701 Rohrenfels

josefbley@web.de

017661444919

0843147448

Josef Thomas Bley

Digital Product Designer

Engagement Architect

Kahlhofweg 2, 86701 Rohrenfels

josefbley@web.de

017661444919

0843147448

Josef Bley

Josef Bley

Josef Bley

Josef Bley